# Documentation Critique and Improvements

## README.md Issues

### 1. Redundancy in "Related projects" section
- **Issue**: Lists features that are already mentioned earlier
- **Fix**: Focus on what makes this library different, not what it includes

### 2. Backend comparison table
- **Issue**: Missing guidance on when to choose each backend
- **Fix**: Add a "When to use" column or separate guidance section

### 3. Example completeness
- **Issue**: Some examples don't show error handling (`?` operator without context)
- **Fix**: Add note about error handling or show `Result` handling

### 4. Description clarity
- **Issue**: Opening description could be more concise
- **Fix**: Lead with the main value proposition

## SCOPE.md Issues

### 1. Outdated relation extraction status
- **Issue**: Says "Traits defined, no models" but TPLinker exists (even if placeholder)
- **Fix**: Update to reflect current status

### 2. Trait hierarchy examples
- **Issue**: Method signatures don't match actual implementations
- **Fix**: Use actual method signatures from code

### 3. Maturity levels
- **Issue**: Some backends listed as "Stable" might be more experimental
- **Fix**: Review and update maturity classifications

## EVALUATION.md Issues

### 1. Missing quick reference
- **Issue**: No quick reference table for common evaluation scenarios
- **Fix**: Add a "Quick reference" section at the top

### 2. Dataset loading details
- **Issue**: Could be clearer about cache behavior and error handling
- **Fix**: Expand with concrete examples

## RESEARCH.md Issues

### 1. Attribution clarity
- **Issue**: Good but could link to actual implementations
- **Fix**: Add links to source files where methods are implemented

## GitHub Metadata Issues

### 1. Description length
- **Issue**: Cargo.toml description is a bit long
- **Fix**: Make it more concise while keeping key info

### 2. Keywords
- **Issue**: Could include more relevant terms (evaluation, zero-shot, etc.)
- **Fix**: Add relevant keywords

### 3. Topics
- **Issue**: GitHub topics not set (need to check via API)
- **Fix**: Add relevant topics

## General Documentation Issues

### 1. Inconsistent terminology
- **Issue**: Sometimes "NER", sometimes "named entity recognition"
- **Fix**: Use consistent terminology (prefer "NER" after first mention)

### 2. Missing "Getting Started" flow
- **Issue**: Examples jump around without a clear progression
- **Fix**: Add a "Quick Start" section that guides users through basic → advanced

### 3. Code examples without context
- **Issue**: Some examples assume knowledge of Rust error handling
- **Fix**: Add brief context or link to Rust docs

