# Specification Quality Checklist: 配置预设与批量管理

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-03-05
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Validation Results

### Content Quality - PASS ✅

- **No implementation details**: Spec focuses on WHAT and WHY without mentioning specific technologies, frameworks, or APIs. All format-specific references (JSON, TOML) have been replaced with technology-agnostic terms ("标准格式文件", "标准数据交换格式")
- **User value focus**: All features are described in terms of user benefits (reducing repetitive operations, enabling sharing, supporting workflows)
- **Non-technical language**: Written in Chinese using business terminology (presets, configurations, tools) rather than technical implementation details
- **Mandatory sections**: All required sections (User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria) are complete

### Requirement Completeness - PASS ✅

- **No clarification markers**: All requirements are clearly defined without [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers
- **Testable requirements**: Each functional requirement (FR-001 through FR-023) is specific and testable
- **Measurable success criteria**: All success criteria include specific metrics (30 seconds, 10 seconds, 90%, 70%, 100%)
- **Technology-agnostic**: Success criteria focus on user-facing outcomes (time to complete, success rate) without technical implementation details
- **Acceptance scenarios**: Each user story includes detailed acceptance scenarios with Given-When-Then format
- **Edge cases identified**: Comprehensive edge case coverage including missing models, uninstalled tools, partial failures, format errors
- **Scope boundaries**: Clear definition of what's included (preset management, batch operations, import/export) and what's not
- **Dependencies documented**: Explicit dependencies on Spec 002 systems (AgentAdapter, ModelConfig, backup system)

### Feature Readiness - PASS ✅

- **Clear acceptance criteria**: Each of the 23 functional requirements has specific, verifiable acceptance criteria
- **User scenarios cover primary flows**: Three prioritized user stories (P1: preset management, P2: batch operations, P3: import/export) cover all major use cases
- **Measurable outcomes**: 8 success criteria define specific, measurable outcomes (time-based, percentage-based, count-based)
- **No implementation leakage**: Specification maintains abstraction level throughout, focusing on user-visible behavior

## Notes

All quality checks passed successfully. The specification is complete and ready for the next phase (`/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`).

### Strengths

1. **Comprehensive edge case coverage**: Detailed handling of error scenarios (missing models, uninstalled tools, partial failures)
2. **Clear prioritization**: User stories are prioritized (P1, P2, P3) with justification for each priority level
3. **Measurable success criteria**: All 8 success criteria include specific, quantifiable metrics
4. **Risk mitigation**: Each identified risk includes concrete mitigation strategies
5. **Independent testability**: Each user story can be developed and tested independently

### Recommendations

- Specification is complete and well-structured
- No clarification questions needed
- Ready to proceed to implementation planning phase

### Improvements Made During Validation

1. **Removed format-specific references**: Replaced "JSON 文件" with "标准格式文件" (standard format file) in acceptance scenarios and functional requirements to maintain technology-agnostic stance
2. **Generalized storage format constraint**: Changed "~/.agentswitch/presets.toml" to "本地文件系统" (local file system) to avoid implementation details
3. **Simplified export format description**: Changed "使用 JSON 格式" to "使用标准数据交换格式" (using standard data exchange format)

These changes ensure the specification focuses entirely on user-visible behavior rather than implementation details, making it suitable for business stakeholders and multiple implementation approaches.
