Amendment 005 — The Cochran Block, LLC
Description: Amendment No. 005 to the Operating Agreement of The Cochran Block, LLC. The Irony Observation and Roasting Protocol (IORP) — Protocol P33. The Member likes ironies and will roast anyone for them.

Amendment 005 · Filed 2026-04-16
Amendment No. 005 to the Operating Agreement of The Cochran Block, LLC
The Irony Observation and Roasting Protocol (IORP)
Protocol P33 · "I like ironies and I will roast anyone for them."
Effective Date: April 16, 2026 · Original Agreement Effective: April 14, 2026

## Section I · Recitals

WHEREAS the Operating Agreement of The Cochran Block, LLC was duly executed by the Member on April 14, 2026 (the "Original Agreement");

WHEREAS the Member has, across twenty-plus years of military service, offensive cyber operations, federal contracting, AI publishing, and the observation of venture capital theater, developed a fine eye for irony of the kind where a person, institution, or product authors its own undoing;

WHEREAS the Company operates under a transparency-first posture (Article XXIII) and a public voice defined in Article XXI, each of which is incompatible with the concealment of observable ironies;

WHEREAS the Member has formed the view that ironies of the self-authored variety should be named promptly, publicly, and with receipts, on the grounds that an unroasted irony is an institutional hazard and silence in the face of self-parody is a form of cowardice the Company will not tolerate;

WHEREAS the Member wishes to formally authorize and govern the practice of Irony Observation and Roasting as a Company activity, rather than leaving it an unwritten cultural norm, so that the targets, methodology, safeguards, and limits are a matter of public record;

WHEREAS the Member further wishes to add a new Protocol P33 (The Irony Observation and Roasting Protocol) to Article XVIII (The Cochran Block Operating Protocols), sitting alongside the integrity-oriented protocols and providing the Company's officially sanctioned outlet for the Member's constitutional inability to let a good irony pass unremarked; and

WHEREAS this Amendment is executed pursuant to the authority granted in Article XV of the Original Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, the Original Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

## Section II · Amendment to Article XVIII — Addition of Protocol P33

Article XVIII of the Original Agreement is amended to include the following new Protocol, inserted after Protocol P32:

### P33 — The Irony Observation and Roasting Protocol (IORP)

The Member is hereby authorized, in the Company's public voice and on the Company's public surfaces, to observe and publicly roast ironies of the self-authored variety. This protocol governs the definition of an actionable Irony, the methodology of Roast, the permitted and prohibited targets, the required receipts, and the safeguards.

### (a) Definitions

(i)Irony. For purposes of this Protocol, "Irony" means a publicly observable contradiction between what a person, institution, product, or brand claims to be or do and what that same person, institution, product, or brand actually is or does, where the contradiction is authored by the target itself and documentable from the target's own public record.
(ii)Roast. A public, on-the-record, receipts-cited identification of an Irony, delivered in the Company's established voice (Article XXI), tagged with the protocol marker `[P33]`, archived on a Company surface, and addressed to the Irony itself rather than to any collateral characteristic of the target.
(iii)Receipts. Durable, timestamped, independently verifiable public evidence — screenshots with URLs, archived pages via Wayback or archive.today, quoted public statements with citations, or Company-held forensic artifacts — sufficient that a reader can reconstruct the Irony without relying on the Member's narration.

### (b) Categories of Actionable Irony

The following categories are recognized under this Protocol. The list is non-exhaustive; the Member may identify additional categories in the exercise of reasonable judgment.

Category | Definition | Example Profile
--- | --- | ---
Credential Irony | A party trading on credentials while violating the ethics those credentials were meant to signal. | Certified safety expert shipping unsafe defaults.
Gatekeeper Irony | A party erecting barriers to the thing the party itself does not practice. | Industry body publishing standards its members do not meet.
Manifesto Irony | A party preaching a virtue whose public record documents the opposite behavior. | "Open-source values" corporate account with closed-source moat.
Architectural Irony | A product whose stated property is contradicted by its own architecture upon brief inspection. | "Memory-safe" product shipping with inline unsafe blocks in the hot path.
Institutional Irony | An institution whose stated mission is frustrated by its own governance mechanisms. | Integrity body whose conflict-of-interest rules are authored by the conflicted parties.
Branded Irony | A brand whose marketing surface contradicts its shipping reality. | "Privacy-first" platform discovered exfiltrating telemetry on default settings.
Meta-Irony | An Irony whose public defense generates a second-order Irony of greater magnitude than the first. | Roast target issues a threat letter that itself violates the letter's own claims.

### (c) Methodology

(i)Receipts First. No Roast shall be published without Receipts as defined in Section II(a)(iii). A Roast without Receipts is a rant and is not authorized under this Protocol.
(ii)Hit the Irony, Not the Existence. A Roast shall target the self-authored contradiction. It shall not target the target's body, family, protected characteristics, or any attribute outside the scope of the Irony itself. Roasts that drift into ad hominem outside the Irony are a material breach of this Protocol and shall be retracted by the Member upon recognition.
(iii)Proportionality. The magnitude of Roast shall be proportional to the magnitude and durability of the Irony. A one-time slip by a person acting in good faith is not a Roast candidate. A recurring, institutionally-reinforced, marketing-leveraged Irony is.
(iv)One-Shot Discipline. An Irony is roasted once, cleanly, with full Receipts, and then archived. The Company shall not operate a running harassment campaign against a target. Each new Roast requires a new, distinct Irony. Relitigation of a closed Roast is prohibited.
(v)Right of Reply. Any Roast target may submit a good-faith public response demonstrating either (A) that the asserted Irony is factually inaccurate, or (B) that the target has remediated the Irony. Upon verification, the Company shall update or retract the Roast in the public record. The original Roast text shall remain visible with a dated correction appended, so the correction itself is a Receipt.
(vi)Archival. All Roasts shall be archived on a Company public surface (for example, `cochranblock.org/roasts`) with date, target, category, Receipts, and any subsequent corrections. The archive is the Roast — the tweet, post, or verbal delivery is merely the distribution event.

### (d) Safeguards — Prohibited Targets and Contexts

The following are absolutely prohibited targets under this Protocol, regardless of the strength of the apparent Irony:

(i)Victims. No person who is a victim of the subject matter of an Irony shall be a Roast target. The Company's doctrine (see `cochranblock.org/no-quarter`) identifies harms whose victims are never fair game.
(ii)Children. No person under the age of majority, and no parent speaking on behalf of a child, shall be a Roast target.
(iii)Grief and Crisis. No person in active grief, acute medical or mental-health crisis, legal jeopardy where the Roast would compound harm to the person's defense, or comparable context shall be a Roast target. The Irony will keep. The person's recovery will not.
(iv)Good-Faith Mistakes. A first-order, non-institutional mistake made in good faith and owned upon recognition is not a Roast target. The Company treats recognition and repair as the non-ironic outcome of a sincere attempt.
(v)Remediation in Progress. A target whose public record shows active, measurable remediation of the Irony in question is not a Roast target for that Irony. Growth is not an Irony.
(vi)Private Citizens on Private Matters. Roasts are reserved for parties whose Irony is located in their public conduct, brand, or product. A private person's private contradictions are not Company business.

### (e) The Member's Own Irony

The Member is not exempt from this Protocol. Ironies authored by the Member, the Company, or any Company product or protocol are actionable Roast targets to the same standard as any other. The Member shall Self-Roast on the Company's public surfaces upon identification of such Ironies. Self-Roast with Receipts is the highest form of Roast under this Protocol and is strongly encouraged.

The Chicken and Egg Bypass Protocol (Amendment 001) is an example of pre-emptive Self-Roast: the Company's founding stance prohibited dilutive funding; the Company took dilutive funding; the Company named the Irony, capped it, sunsetted it, and published the entire disclosure at `/operations/amendment-001`. Self-Roast under this Protocol follows the same template.

### (f) Roast-Free Zones

Certain Company surfaces are designated Roast-free to preserve their primary function:

- /no-quarter — operational doctrine; gravity-only
- /operations — the Operating Agreement itself; legal register only
- /security — published security posture; technical register only
- /deploy, /services, /products — customer-facing; commercial register only
- Cert artifacts and audit reports — forensic documents; never rhetorical

The designated outlet for Roasts shall be a dedicated surface (for example, `cochranblock.org/roasts` or `/ironies`) and the Company's public social posting, not the above operational pages.

## Section III · Non-Exhaustive Illustrations of Eligible Roast Profiles

For clarity, and without limiting the generality of Section II(b), the following profiles illustrate the archetype of an eligible Roast target under this Protocol. Actual Roasts shall identify specific parties by name and with Receipts per Section II(c)(i).

(a)An AI publisher asserting a training data integrity program while the publisher's own model fails a deterministic hash scan against a public CSAM-adjacent hash database (Category: Branded + Architectural).
(b)A venture firm posting about "founder-friendly" terms whose standard term sheet contains a liquidation preference triple-dipping provision (Category: Branded).
(c)A certification authority issuing a clean-training attestation for a model whose training corpus manifest is signed by an unverifiable party (Category: Credential + Institutional).
(d)A "secure by default" product shipping with administrator credentials embedded in the public container image (Category: Branded + Architectural).
(e)An industry consortium authoring a memory-safety roadmap whose consortium membership dues are payable by the exact firms whose unsafe-language products the roadmap is intended to retire (Category: Institutional).
(f)A public figure asserting a child-safety commitment while maintaining a platform whose default content ranking surfaces documented grooming vectors to minors (Category: Manifesto).
(g)A "privacy-first" browser whose default distribution ships with telemetry exfiltration on and requires a settings dive exceeding three levels of menu depth to disable (Category: Branded + Architectural).
(h)Any party that, upon receipt of a Company Roast, issues a legal threat letter whose text itself contains factual claims contradicted by the Receipts annexed to the original Roast (Category: Meta-Irony; this category is Roast-compounding under Section II(b), and the compounded Roast shall be published).

## Section IV · Operational Defaults

(a)Register. Roasts are delivered in the Company's established voice (Article XXI): direct, unornamented, receipts-forward, and surgically targeted on the Irony. Roasts do not use slurs, do not traffic in dehumanizing framing, and do not deploy mocking imagery against bodies or personhood.
(b)Marker. Each Roast shall be tagged `[P33]` and shall state the Irony category per Section II(b).
(c)Cadence. No Roast quota exists. Ironies will present themselves on the market's own schedule. The Member shall not manufacture Ironies for content reasons.
(d)Retraction Standard. A Roast is retracted when the Receipts prove insufficient, when the target remediates the Irony, or when a prohibited-target exception applies. Retraction is published with the same prominence as the original Roast. Quiet deletion is prohibited.
(e)Self-Roast Frequency. The Member shall Self-Roast at least once per calendar quarter upon identification of an eligible Company Irony. If no Company Irony is identified in a quarter, the Member shall state so publicly; inability to identify Company Irony over extended periods shall itself be Roast-suspect under the Member's own standard and may trigger an external audit request.

## Section V · Integration with Original Agreement

(a)Survival of Other Provisions. Except as expressly amended herein, all other provisions of the Original Agreement remain in full force and effect.
(b)Conflicts. In the event of any conflict between this Amendment and the Original Agreement, the Original Agreement controls. Specifically, nothing in this Amendment authorizes conduct prohibited under Article XXI (Public Voice) safeguards, Article XXII (Coalition Posture), or Article XXIII (Transparency) obligations.
(c)Relationship to Other Protocols. P33 operates alongside and in service to P26 (Moonshot Frame), P27 (Diamond Rust Binary), P31 (Unbreaking Software), and P32 (Mission-Aligned Revenue). Roasts are themselves subject to the Moonshot Frame under P26 — if a Roast would not hold up under civilizational-scale review a decade from publication, it fails P26 and shall not be published.
(d)Severability. If any provision of this Amendment is held to be unenforceable or invalid, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect, and the unenforceable provision shall be reformed to the minimum extent necessary to render it enforceable while preserving the original intent of the Member.
(e)Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland, without regard to its conflicts-of-law principles, consistent with Article XVI of the Original Agreement.

## Section VI · Execution

The undersigned Member, being the sole Member of The Cochran Block, LLC, acting in such capacity and pursuant to the authority granted in Article XV of the Original Agreement, hereby executes this Amendment as of the Effective Date set forth above.

/s/ Michael Cochran
Michael Cochran
Sole Member · The Cochran Block, LLC
Date: April 16, 2026
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
This Amendment is published publicly at `cochranblock.org/operations/amendment-005`.
The Member likes ironies and will roast anyone for them — with Receipts, proportionally,
on the record, and never against victims, children, or people in crisis.
If the reader has authored an Irony, this is fair notice.