# RFC: <title>

- **Status:** Draft
- **Date:** <YYYY-MM-DD>

## Summary

One paragraph: what this changes and why.

## Motivation

What problem does this solve, who hits it, and what does the current behaviour cost?

## Design

The proposed change in enough detail to evaluate it, including the request/response shapes, types, or interfaces it touches.

## DynamoDB compatibility

Does this change dynoxide's observable behaviour relative to AWS DynamoDB? If so, describe the difference and link the AWS documentation or behaviour note that motivates it. dynoxide exists to behave like DynamoDB, so a divergence needs a reason.

## Alternatives

What else was considered, and why this approach over those.

## Open questions

Anything still undecided.
