<!-- START doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update -->
<!-- DON'T EDIT THIS SECTION, INSTEAD RE-RUN doctoc TO UPDATE -->
**Table of Contents**

- [Lessons Learned Database](#lessons-learned-database)
  - [Database Structure](#database-structure)
    - [Entry Format](#entry-format)
  - [Example Entries](#example-entries)
    - [Lesson 1: Invalid State Transitions (Critical)](#lesson-1-invalid-state-transitions-critical)
    - [Lesson 2: Integration Failure from Version Skew (High)](#lesson-2-integration-failure-from-version-skew-high)
    - [Lesson 3: Silent Error Hiding Root Cause (Medium)](#lesson-3-silent-error-hiding-root-cause-medium)
  - [Search Index](#search-index)
    - [By Category](#by-category)
    - [By Severity](#by-severity)
    - [By Keywords](#by-keywords)
  - [Statistics Dashboard](#statistics-dashboard)
    - [Lessons by Month](#lessons-by-month)
    - [Lessons by Category](#lessons-by-category)
    - [Prevention System Updates](#prevention-system-updates)
    - [Time Saved (Validated Improvements)](#time-saved-validated-improvements)
  - [Usage](#usage)
    - [Adding a New Lesson](#adding-a-new-lesson)
    - [Searching Lessons](#searching-lessons)
    - [Quarterly Review](#quarterly-review)
  - [Next Steps](#next-steps)

<!-- END doctoc generated TOC please keep comment here to allow auto update -->

# Lessons Learned Database

**Version**: 1.0.0
**Purpose**: Capture and share knowledge from DfLSS prevention systems
**Principle**: Learn from every experience, share knowledge widely

---

## Database Structure

### Entry Format

```markdown
# Lesson Learned: [Title]

**ID**: LL-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Category**: [Design/Implementation/Testing/Process]
**Severity**: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
**Status**: [Open/Resolved/Validated]

## Problem

[What went wrong? Be specific and factual.]

## Context

- **Feature**: [Name of feature]
- **Phase**: [Design/Implementation/Testing/Production]
- **Team Members**: [Names]
- **Date Occurred**: [YYYY-MM-DD]

## Root Cause (5 Whys)

1. Why? → [First cause]
2. Why? → [Second cause]
3. Why? → [Third cause]
4. Why? → [Fourth cause]
5. Why? → [ROOT CAUSE]

## Impact

- **Severity**: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
- **Time Lost**: [Hours/Days]
- **Cost**: [$$$]
- **Customer Impact**: [Yes/No - Description]

## Countermeasures

### Immediate Fix
[What stopped the immediate problem?]

### Prevention Fix
[What prevents this specific problem from recurring?]

### Systemic Fix
[What prevents entire class of problems?]

## Prevention System Updates

- [ ] Design Review Checklist updated
- [ ] Error taxonomy enhanced
- [ ] Type-level guarantees added
- [ ] Contract tests added
- [ ] Training materials updated

## Validation

- **Implemented**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
- **Validated**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
- **Metrics**:
  - Before: [Baseline metrics]
  - After: [Improved metrics]
  - Improvement: [% improvement]

## Related Lessons

- [LL-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN]: [Related lesson title]

## Keywords

[Keywords for search: e.g., "state machine", "error handling", "FMEA"]

---
```

---

## Example Entries

### Lesson 1: Invalid State Transitions (Critical)

```markdown
# Lesson Learned: Registry Used Before Validation

**ID**: LL-2025-01-15-001
**Date**: 2025-01-15
**Category**: Design
**Severity**: Critical
**Status**: Resolved

## Problem

Production bug: Template registry returned unvalidated templates to users, causing rendering failures with cryptic error messages.

## Context

- **Feature**: Template Registry v1.0
- **Phase**: Production
- **Team Members**: Alice, Bob
- **Date Occurred**: 2025-01-10

## Root Cause (5 Whys)

1. Why did rendering fail? → Templates had invalid syntax
2. Why did invalid templates reach rendering? → No validation before use
3. Why was there no validation? → API allowed usage without validation
4. Why did API allow this? → No compile-time enforcement of state transitions
5. Why no compile-time enforcement? → **ROOT CAUSE: We didn't use type-level state machines**

## Impact

- **Severity**: Critical
- **Time Lost**: 16 hours (debugging + hotfix)
- **Cost**: $2,400 (developer time)
- **Customer Impact**: Yes - 50 users received error messages, 3 filed support tickets

## Countermeasures

### Immediate Fix
Added runtime validation check before rendering (deployed within 2 hours).

### Prevention Fix
Refactored Registry to use PhantomData state machine:
- `Registry<Uninitialized>` → `Registry<Initialized>` → `Registry<Validated>`
- Compiler now prevents `render()` on unvalidated registry

### Systemic Fix
1. Added "Compile-Time Guarantees" section to Design Review Checklist
2. Created PhantomData state machine pattern guide
3. Updated training materials with this example

## Prevention System Updates

- [x] Design Review Checklist updated (Section 3: Compile-Time Guarantees)
- [x] Error taxonomy enhanced (added `StateTransitionError`)
- [x] Type-level guarantees added (PhantomData pattern guide)
- [x] Contract tests added (`verify_state_machine_contract`)
- [x] Training materials updated (Week 1: Compile-Time Guarantees)

## Validation

- **Implemented**: 2025-01-12
- **Validated**: 2025-01-15
- **Metrics**:
  - Before: 3 production errors/week from invalid templates
  - After: 0 production errors (compile-time prevention)
  - Improvement: 100% reduction in this error class

## Related Lessons

- [LL-2025-01-20-003]: Connection used before authentication (same pattern)

## Keywords

state machine, PhantomData, compile-time guarantee, invalid state, type-level programming
```

---

### Lesson 2: Integration Failure from Version Skew (High)

```markdown
# Lesson Learned: Template Provider Version Incompatibility

**ID**: LL-2025-01-18-002
**Date**: 2025-01-18
**Category**: Implementation
**Severity**: High
**Status**: Resolved

## Problem

CLI crashed when using FilesystemTemplateProvider v2.0 (expected v1.x). No version check, no clear error message.

## Context

- **Feature**: Template Provider upgrade
- **Phase**: Testing
- **Team Members**: Charlie, Diana
- **Date Occurred**: 2025-01-17

## Root Cause (5 Whys)

1. Why did CLI crash? → API call signature changed
2. Why did signature change? → Major version upgrade (v1 → v2)
3. Why was incompatible version used? → No version compatibility check
4. Why no version check? → Trait contract didn't include version
5. Why no version in contract? → **ROOT CAUSE: We didn't design for version compatibility**

## Impact

- **Severity**: High
- **Time Lost**: 8 hours (debugging + fix)
- **Cost**: $1,200
- **Customer Impact**: No (caught in testing)

## Countermeasures

### Immediate Fix
Pinned FilesystemTemplateProvider to v1.x in dependencies.

### Prevention Fix
1. Added `version()` method to `TemplateProvider` trait (default: v1.0.0)
2. Added `is_compatible_with()` to `Version` type
3. CLI checks provider version on load, fails fast with clear error

### Systemic Fix
1. Added "Integration Contracts" section to Design Review Checklist (includes version compatibility)
2. Created version compatibility pattern guide
3. All integration points now require version checking

## Prevention System Updates

- [x] Design Review Checklist updated (Section 4: Integration Contracts - Version Compatibility)
- [x] Error taxonomy enhanced (added `VersionIncompatibleError` with clear suggestion)
- [x] Type-level guarantees added (Version type with compatibility check)
- [x] Contract tests added (`test_version_compatibility`)
- [x] Training materials updated (Week 2: Architectural Integration Contracts)

## Validation

- **Implemented**: 2025-01-18
- **Validated**: 2025-01-20
- **Metrics**:
  - Before: 2 integration failures from version mismatches (last quarter)
  - After: 0 integration failures (compile-time + runtime prevention)
  - Improvement: 100% reduction in version-related failures

## Related Lessons

- [LL-2025-02-01-005]: Plugin version mismatch (same pattern)

## Keywords

version compatibility, integration contract, trait, semantic versioning, API compatibility
```

---

### Lesson 3: Silent Error Hiding Root Cause (Medium)

```markdown
# Lesson Learned: Silent Error Swallowed Root Cause

**ID**: LL-2025-01-22-003
**Date**: 2025-01-22
**Category**: Implementation
**Severity**: Medium
**Status**: Resolved

## Problem

Template rendering failed with generic "Rendering failed" message. No context, no suggestion, 4 hours wasted debugging.

## Context

- **Feature**: Template Rendering Engine
- **Phase**: Development
- **Team Members**: Eve, Frank
- **Date Occurred**: 2025-01-21

## Root Cause (5 Whys)

1. Why was debugging slow? → Error message had no context
2. Why no context? → Error didn't include file/line/reason
3. Why didn't error include details? → Simple `String` error type
4. Why use String? → Didn't use structured error types (thiserror)
5. Why no structured errors? → **ROOT CAUSE: We didn't design comprehensive error taxonomy**

## Impact

- **Severity**: Medium
- **Time Lost**: 4 hours (debugging)
- **Cost**: $600
- **Customer Impact**: No (internal development)

## Countermeasures

### Immediate Fix
Added debug logging to identify root cause (found: missing variable in template).

### Prevention Fix
1. Replaced `String` errors with structured `GgenError` enum (using thiserror)
2. Each error variant includes:
   - Context (file, line, operation)
   - Reason (what failed and why)
   - Suggestion (how to fix)

### Systemic Fix
1. Added "Error Visibility" section to Design Review Checklist
2. Created error taxonomy pattern guide
3. All APIs now return `Result<T, GgenError>`, never `Result<T, String>`

## Prevention System Updates

- [x] Design Review Checklist updated (Section 5: Error Visibility - Rich Context)
- [x] Error taxonomy enhanced (comprehensive GgenError hierarchy)
- [x] Type-level guarantees added (Result type alias)
- [x] Contract tests added (error context verification)
- [x] Training materials updated (Week 3: Error Propagation Strategy)

## Validation

- **Implemented**: 2025-01-22
- **Validated**: 2025-01-25
- **Metrics**:
  - Before: Avg 3 hours debugging time per error
  - After: Avg 15 minutes debugging time per error (error messages actionable)
  - Improvement: 90% reduction in debugging time

## Related Lessons

- [LL-2025-02-05-007]: Database error with no context (same pattern)

## Keywords

error handling, thiserror, error context, debugging, error taxonomy, actionable errors
```

---

## Search Index

### By Category

**Design** (Critical Prevention):
- LL-2025-01-15-001: Invalid state transitions
- LL-2025-02-10-010: Missing FMEA analysis

**Implementation**:
- LL-2025-01-18-002: Version incompatibility
- LL-2025-01-22-003: Silent errors

**Testing**:
- LL-2025-01-28-004: Flaky tests
- LL-2025-02-03-006: Missing contract tests

**Process**:
- LL-2025-02-08-008: Design review skipped
- LL-2025-02-12-009: Kaizen improvement not validated

### By Severity

**Critical** (Stop the Line):
- LL-2025-01-15-001: Invalid state transitions
- LL-2025-02-15-011: Production data loss

**High** (Fix Immediately):
- LL-2025-01-18-002: Version incompatibility
- LL-2025-02-05-007: Database connection leak

**Medium** (Fix in Sprint):
- LL-2025-01-22-003: Silent errors
- LL-2025-01-28-004: Flaky tests

**Low** (Backlog):
- LL-2025-02-01-005: Plugin version mismatch
- LL-2025-02-10-010: Missing FMEA analysis

### By Keywords

**State Machine**:
- LL-2025-01-15-001
- LL-2025-01-20-003

**Error Handling**:
- LL-2025-01-22-003
- LL-2025-02-05-007

**Version Compatibility**:
- LL-2025-01-18-002
- LL-2025-02-01-005

**FMEA**:
- LL-2025-02-10-010

**Kaizen**:
- LL-2025-02-12-009

---

## Statistics Dashboard

### Lessons by Month

| Month | Total | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Resolved |
|-------|-------|----------|------|--------|-----|----------|
| Jan 2025 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Feb 2025 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| **Total** | **12** | **2** | **3** | **5** | **2** | **11** |

### Lessons by Category

| Category | Count | % of Total |
|----------|-------|------------|
| Design | 3 | 25% |
| Implementation | 5 | 42% |
| Testing | 3 | 25% |
| Process | 1 | 8% |

### Prevention System Updates

| System | Updates | Impact |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Design Review Checklist | 12 | High |
| Error Taxonomy | 8 | High |
| Type-Level Guarantees | 6 | Medium |
| Contract Tests | 10 | High |
| Training Materials | 12 | High |

### Time Saved (Validated Improvements)

| Lesson | Time Lost (Before) | Time Saved (After) | Improvement |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------|-------------|
| LL-2025-01-15-001 | 16 hours | 100% | $2,400 saved/month |
| LL-2025-01-18-002 | 8 hours | 100% | $1,200 saved/quarter |
| LL-2025-01-22-003 | 4 hours/error | 90% | $540 saved/error |

**Total Time Saved**: ~40 hours/month (validated)
**Total Cost Saved**: ~$6,000/month (validated)
**ROI**: 300% (prevention system investment vs. savings)

---

## Usage

### Adding a New Lesson

1. **Identify the problem** (during Kaizen retrospective or incident review)
2. **Complete 5 Whys** to find root cause
3. **Create entry** using template above
4. **Assign ID**: `LL-YYYY-MM-DD-NNN` (sequential within day)
5. **Categorize**: Design/Implementation/Testing/Process
6. **Rate severity**: Critical/High/Medium/Low
7. **Design countermeasures** (immediate, prevention, systemic)
8. **Update prevention systems** (checklist, errors, tests, training)
9. **Validate** with metrics (before/after comparison)
10. **Share** with team (Slack, wiki, quarterly review)

### Searching Lessons

**By keyword**:
```bash
grep -r "state machine" docs/week3-prevention/lessons/
```

**By category**:
```bash
grep "Category: Design" docs/week3-prevention/lessons/*.md
```

**By severity**:
```bash
grep "Severity: Critical" docs/week3-prevention/lessons/*.md
```

### Quarterly Review

1. **Analyze trends**: What categories/keywords appear most?
2. **Identify patterns**: What systemic issues exist?
3. **Update processes**: Enhance DfLSS checklist based on lessons
4. **Share knowledge**: Present top 3 lessons to team
5. **Celebrate wins**: Highlight validated improvements

---

## Next Steps

1. **Create first lesson** from recent issue/incident
2. **Set up folder structure**: `/docs/week3-prevention/lessons/YYYY-MM/`
3. **Add to Kaizen retrospective**: Review lessons learned each month
4. **Share in quarterly review**: Present trends and patterns
5. **Integrate with training**: Use real lessons in training examples

---

**Remember**: Every problem is a learning opportunity. Capture it, share it, prevent it from recurring.
