# Specification Quality Checklist: SDK Review Hardening

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-01-17
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Reviewer Perspective Coverage

- [x] Open Source Advocate concerns addressed (community standards)
- [x] Rust Purist concerns addressed (idiomatic code)
- [x] Quality Engineer concerns addressed (test coverage)
- [x] Linus Torvalds concerns addressed (simplification)
- [x] Junior Dev valid concerns addressed (security nitpicks)
- [x] Security Architect concerns addressed (crypto, secrets)
- [x] Network Architect concerns addressed (enterprise networking)
- [x] Amazon WebDev concerns addressed (integration pain)

## Notes

- This spec consolidates findings from 8 adversarial reviewer personas
- Priority P0 (security) items are blockers for public release
- Priority P1 items will cause immediate negative reception on Reddit/HN
- Priority P2-P3 items are improvements that enhance adoption
- Spec is ready for `/speckit.plan` to generate implementation tasks
