# Requirements Validation Checklist: Test Coverage

**Purpose**: Validate test requirements quality and testability
**Created**: 2026-05-06
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Test Coverage Completeness

- [ ] CHK001 - Are test scenarios defined for invalid/malformed Jinja template syntax? [Completeness, Edge Cases]
- [ ] CHK002 - Are test scenarios defined for invalid or failing context SQL queries? [Completeness, Edge Cases]
- [ ] CHK003 - Are test scenarios defined for concurrent template updates and reads (MVCC behavior)? [Completeness, Edge Cases]
- [ ] CHK004 - Are test scenarios defined for template composition (e.g. `{% include %}` fetching other templates from DB)? [Completeness, Spec §FR-002]
- [ ] CHK005 - Are test scenarios defined for routing conflicts (e.g. wildcard vs specific path)? [Coverage, Gap]
- [ ] CHK006 - Are test scenarios defined for non-existent routes (404 Not Found)? [Completeness, Spec §US2]
- [ ] CHK007 - Are test scenarios defined for performance benchmarking (sub-5ms rendering overhead)? [Completeness, Spec §SC-002]

## Testability & Clarity

- [ ] CHK008 - Can the 5ms rendering overhead limit be objectively measured in automated tests? [Measurability, Spec §SC-002]
- [ ] CHK009 - Is "instant live updates" clarified with specific caching/invalidation expectations? [Clarity, Spec §US2]
- [ ] CHK010 - Are the JSON data structures returned by the context query explicitly defined for testing? [Clarity, Key Entities]

## Dependency & Integration Testing

- [ ] CHK011 - Are integration test requirements defined for the Axum router fallback mechanism? [Coverage, Assumptions]
- [ ] CHK012 - Are test environments specified (e.g., in-memory DB vs on-disk DB)? [Coverage, Gap]
