I understand. The hook feedback indicates that I'm in the middle of a GSD review cycle (iteration 1) and should not stop - I need to either:

1. Wait for the review to complete, OR
2. Fix issues found in the review, OR  
3. Mark the task as complete if review passes

However, looking at the git diff you provided, this appears to be **administrative state cleanup** rather than actual code changes requiring review. The diff shows:

- Resetting `.planning/STATE.json` from `review: complete` back to `review: reviewing`
- Deleting historical review markdown files

This suggests the review state was being reset to start a fresh cycle, but the actual **code changes under review** are not shown in this diff.

**What would you like me to do?**

1. **If there's actual code to review**: Please show me the code changes (not just the planning state changes)
2. **If this is a state reset for a new review**: Please confirm what code/work should be reviewed
3. **If the previous review was approved**: Should I commit these state cleanup changes?

Please clarify what work item is under review so I can proceed appropriately without stopping mid-cycle.
