# SPARC Implementation Roadmap
## Sublinear-Time Solver Development Plan

**Project Duration**: 10 weeks
**Target Launch**: Production-ready Rust + WASM solver
**Methodology**: SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion)

---

## 🎯 Project Overview

This roadmap implements a high-performance sublinear-time solver using the SPARC methodology across 5 distinct phases. Each phase builds systematically on the previous, ensuring robust architecture and comprehensive validation.

### Core Deliverables
- **Rust Library**: High-performance native solver
- **WASM Module**: Browser-compatible package
- **CLI Tool**: Command-line interface
- **Cloud Integration**: Flow-Nexus deployment
- **Documentation**: Complete technical guides

---

## 📊 Phase Overview & Timeline

```
Phase S: System Design & Scaffold     [Weeks 1-2] ████████████████
Phase P: Push Method Implementation   [Weeks 3-4] ████████████████
Phase A: Advanced Hybrid Integration [Weeks 5-6] ████████████████
Phase R: Rust-to-WASM Release        [Weeks 7-8] ████████████████
Phase C: CLI & Cloud Integration     [Weeks 9-10] ███████████████
```

### Dependency Graph
```
Phase S (Foundation)
    ├── Phase P (Core Algorithms)
    │   ├── Phase A (Advanced Features)
    │   │   ├── Phase R (WASM Packaging)
    │   │   └── Phase C (CLI & Cloud)
    │   └── Phase C (Parallel Track)
    └── Phase R (Documentation Track)
```

---

## 🏗️ Phase S: System Design & Scaffold (Weeks 1-2)

### **Week 1: Architecture & Foundation**

#### Milestone Checklist
- [ ] **Rust Project Initialization**
  - [x] `cargo new sublinear-solver --lib`
  - [ ] Configure Cargo.toml with dependencies
  - [ ] Set up workspace structure for multi-crate project
  - [ ] Initialize git repository with proper .gitignore

- [ ] **Core Module Structure**
  ```
  src/
  ├── lib.rs                 # Public API exports
  ├── algorithms/            # Algorithm implementations
  │   ├── mod.rs
  │   ├── push_forward.rs    # Forward push implementation
  │   ├── push_backward.rs   # Backward push implementation
  │   ├── neumann.rs         # Neumann series solver
  │   └── random_walk.rs     # Random walk engine
  ├── data_structures/       # Core data types
  │   ├── mod.rs
  │   ├── graph.rs           # Graph representation
  │   ├── matrix.rs          # Sparse matrix handling
  │   └── vector.rs          # Dense vector operations
  ├── solvers/               # High-level solver interfaces
  │   ├── mod.rs
  │   ├── linear_system.rs   # Linear system solver
  │   ├── pagerank.rs        # PageRank-specific solver
  │   └── hybrid.rs          # Hybrid algorithm orchestrator
  ├── utils/                 # Utilities and helpers
  │   ├── mod.rs
  │   ├── validation.rs      # Input validation
  │   ├── metrics.rs         # Performance metrics
  │   └── error.rs           # Error handling
  └── wasm/                  # WASM-specific bindings
      ├── mod.rs
      └── bindings.rs
  ```

- [ ] **Trait Definitions & Interfaces**
  ```rust
  // Core solver trait
  pub trait SublinearSolver<T> {
      type Error;
      fn solve(&mut self, problem: &T) -> Result<SolverResult, Self::Error>;
      fn configure(&mut self, options: SolverOptions) -> Result<(), Self::Error>;
  }

  // Algorithm-specific traits
  pub trait PushAlgorithm {
      fn forward_push(&self, start: NodeId, budget: f64) -> Result<Vector, PushError>;
      fn backward_push(&self, target: NodeId, budget: f64) -> Result<Vector, PushError>;
  }

  pub trait RandomWalk {
      fn random_walk(&self, start: NodeId, steps: usize) -> Result<WalkResult, WalkError>;
      fn multi_walk(&self, starts: &[NodeId], steps: usize) -> Result<WalkResult, WalkError>;
  }
  ```

#### Week 1 Deliverables
- [x] Rust project structure with proper module organization
- [ ] Core trait definitions for all algorithm types
- [ ] Basic data structure stubs (Graph, Matrix, Vector)
- [ ] Error handling framework
- [ ] Initial documentation framework with rustdoc
- [ ] CI/CD setup (GitHub Actions for Rust)

### **Week 2: Data Structures & Scaffolding**

#### Tasks
- [ ] **Graph Data Structure Implementation**
  - [ ] Adjacency list representation
  - [ ] CSR (Compressed Sparse Row) format support
  - [ ] Graph loading from common formats (CSV, MTX)
  - [ ] Memory-efficient storage patterns

- [ ] **Sparse Matrix Infrastructure**
  - [ ] CSR matrix implementation
  - [ ] Matrix-vector multiplication optimizations
  - [ ] Memory pool management
  - [ ] SIMD acceleration preparation

- [ ] **Vector Operations**
  - [ ] Dense vector with SIMD operations
  - [ ] Sparse vector representation
  - [ ] Norm calculations and basic operations
  - [ ] Memory-aligned allocations

- [ ] **Stub Algorithm Implementations**
  - [ ] Forward push skeleton with correct signature
  - [ ] Backward push skeleton
  - [ ] Neumann series iteration framework
  - [ ] Random walk infrastructure

#### Week 2 Deliverables
- [ ] Complete data structure implementations with tests
- [ ] Stub algorithms that compile and accept correct inputs
- [ ] Memory benchmarking infrastructure
- [ ] Documentation for all public APIs
- [ ] Integration test framework setup

### **Quality Gates - Phase S**
- ✅ **Architecture Review**: Module structure approved
- ✅ **API Design**: All traits and interfaces finalized
- ✅ **Documentation**: 100% rustdoc coverage for public APIs
- ✅ **Testing**: Unit tests for all data structures
- ✅ **Performance**: Memory usage baseline established

---

## 🚀 Phase P: Push Method Implementation (Weeks 3-4)

### **Week 3: Forward & Backward Push Algorithms**

#### Forward Push Implementation
- [ ] **Core Algorithm Development**
  ```rust
  impl PushAlgorithm for ForwardPush {
      fn forward_push(&self, start: NodeId, budget: f64) -> Result<Vector, PushError> {
          // 1. Initialize probability vector
          // 2. Implement budget-constrained pushing
          // 3. Handle convergence criteria
          // 4. Return residual + final estimates
      }
  }
  ```

- [ ] **Implementation Tasks**
  - [ ] Probability vector initialization and management
  - [ ] Budget allocation and tracking system
  - [ ] Neighbor iteration with early termination
  - [ ] Convergence detection mechanisms
  - [ ] Memory-efficient residual tracking

- [ ] **Backward Push Implementation**
  - [ ] Reverse graph traversal logic
  - [ ] Target-focused probability computation
  - [ ] Efficient reverse neighbor handling
  - [ ] Dual convergence criteria (forward + backward)

#### Week 3 Deliverables
- [ ] Working forward push with configurable parameters
- [ ] Working backward push with reverse graph support
- [ ] Unit tests for both algorithms with small graphs
- [ ] Performance profiling infrastructure
- [ ] Basic convergence validation

### **Week 4: Neumann Series & Integration**

#### Neumann Series Solver
- [ ] **Mathematical Implementation**
  ```rust
  pub struct NeumannSolver {
      max_iterations: usize,
      tolerance: f64,
      acceleration: AccelerationType,
  }

  impl NeumannSolver {
      fn solve_series(&self, A: &SparseMatrix, b: &Vector) -> Result<Vector, NeumannError> {
          // x = b + A*b + A²*b + A³*b + ...
          // Implement with Anderson acceleration
      }
  }
  ```

- [ ] **Implementation Features**
  - [ ] Iterative matrix powers computation
  - [ ] Anderson acceleration for faster convergence
  - [ ] Adaptive tolerance adjustment
  - [ ] Memory-bounded iteration tracking
  - [ ] Residual norm monitoring

#### PageRank Test Integration
- [ ] **Test Case Development**
  - [ ] Small graph PageRank validation (10-100 nodes)
  - [ ] Medium graph testing (1K-10K nodes)
  - [ ] Comparison with reference implementations
  - [ ] Convergence rate analysis
  - [ ] Accuracy validation against analytical solutions

#### Performance Optimization
- [ ] **Algorithmic Improvements**
  - [ ] SIMD vectorization for vector operations
  - [ ] Cache-friendly memory access patterns
  - [ ] Parallel computation preparation
  - [ ] Memory pool optimization
  - [ ] Branch prediction optimization

#### Week 4 Deliverables
- [ ] Complete Neumann series implementation
- [ ] PageRank solver using push methods
- [ ] Comprehensive test suite with 90% coverage
- [ ] Performance benchmarks vs baseline algorithms
- [ ] Accuracy validation report

### **Quality Gates - Phase P**
- ✅ **Algorithm Correctness**: All push methods produce correct results
- ✅ **Performance**: Sublinear scaling demonstrated on test graphs
- ✅ **Testing**: 90%+ code coverage with edge case handling
- ✅ **Documentation**: Algorithm documentation with complexity analysis
- ✅ **Integration**: All algorithms work together seamlessly

---

## 🔬 Phase A: Advanced Hybrid Integration (Weeks 5-6)

### **Week 5: Random Walk Engine & Hybrid Orchestration**

#### Random Walk Implementation
- [ ] **Core Random Walk Engine**
  ```rust
  pub struct RandomWalkEngine {
      rng: ChaCha8Rng,
      walk_length: usize,
      num_walks: usize,
      restart_probability: f64,
  }

  impl RandomWalk for RandomWalkEngine {
      fn random_walk(&self, start: NodeId, steps: usize) -> Result<WalkResult, WalkError> {
          // Implement efficient random walk with restart
          // Use reservoir sampling for large graphs
          // Support personalized PageRank
      }
  }
  ```

- [ ] **Advanced Features**
  - [ ] Parallel random walk execution
  - [ ] Restart probability handling (personalized PageRank)
  - [ ] Reservoir sampling for memory efficiency
  - [ ] Walk result aggregation and statistics
  - [ ] Confidence interval computation

#### Hybrid Algorithm Orchestrator
- [ ] **Intelligent Algorithm Selection**
  ```rust
  pub struct HybridSolver {
      graph_analyzer: GraphAnalyzer,
      push_solver: PushSolver,
      walk_engine: RandomWalkEngine,
      neumann_solver: NeumannSolver,
  }

  impl HybridSolver {
      fn select_algorithm(&self, problem: &Problem) -> AlgorithmChoice {
          // Analyze graph properties
          // Choose optimal algorithm combination
          // Set adaptive parameters
      }
  }
  ```

- [ ] **Selection Heuristics**
  - [ ] Graph density analysis
  - [ ] Problem size estimation
  - [ ] Accuracy requirement assessment
  - [ ] Time budget considerations
  - [ ] Memory constraint handling

#### Week 5 Deliverables
- [ ] Complete random walk engine with parallel execution
- [ ] Hybrid orchestrator with intelligent algorithm selection
- [ ] Graph analysis utilities for algorithm selection
- [ ] Performance comparison framework
- [ ] Adaptive parameter tuning system

### **Week 6: Unified API & Advanced Features**

#### Unified Solver Interface
- [ ] **High-Level API Design**
  ```rust
  pub struct SublinearSolver {
      config: SolverConfig,
      backend: HybridSolver,
  }

  impl SublinearSolver {
      pub fn new() -> Self { /* Default configuration */ }

      pub fn solve_pagerank(&mut self, graph: &Graph) -> Result<PageRankResult, SolverError> {
          // Unified PageRank interface
      }

      pub fn solve_linear_system(&mut self, A: &SparseMatrix, b: &Vector) -> Result<Vector, SolverError> {
          // Unified linear system interface
      }

      pub fn configure(&mut self) -> ConfigBuilder {
          // Fluent configuration API
      }
  }
  ```

#### Configuration & Options Management
- [ ] **Comprehensive Configuration System**
  - [ ] Algorithm-specific parameter tuning
  - [ ] Performance vs accuracy trade-offs
  - [ ] Memory budget constraints
  - [ ] Parallel execution settings
  - [ ] Debugging and profiling options

- [ ] **Fluent Configuration API**
  ```rust
  let solver = SublinearSolver::new()
      .with_accuracy(1e-8)
      .with_memory_budget(GiB(2))
      .with_parallel_threads(8)
      .with_algorithm_preference(AlgorithmType::Hybrid)
      .build()?;
  ```

#### Medium-Scale Testing
- [ ] **Comprehensive Test Suite**
  - [ ] Graphs with 10K-100K nodes
  - [ ] Various graph topologies (social, web, random)
  - [ ] Streaming graph updates
  - [ ] Memory stress testing
  - [ ] Parallel execution validation

#### Week 6 Deliverables
- [ ] Unified solver API with comprehensive configuration
- [ ] Medium-scale testing infrastructure
- [ ] Performance profiling and optimization
- [ ] Sublinear scaling validation on real datasets
- [ ] API documentation and usage examples

### **Quality Gates - Phase A**
- ✅ **Integration**: All algorithms work seamlessly together
- ✅ **Performance**: Sublinear scaling maintained across all features
- ✅ **Usability**: Intuitive API with comprehensive configuration
- ✅ **Testing**: Medium-scale validation completed
- ✅ **Documentation**: Complete API documentation with examples

---

## 📦 Phase R: Rust-to-WASM Release Pipeline (Weeks 7-8)

### **Week 7: WASM Integration & Bindings**

#### wasm-bindgen Setup
- [ ] **WASM Compilation Configuration**
  ```toml
  [lib]
  crate-type = ["cdylib", "rlib"]

  [dependencies]
  wasm-bindgen = "0.2"
  js-sys = "0.3"
  web-sys = "0.3"
  serde = { version = "1.0", features = ["derive"] }
  serde-wasm-bindgen = "0.4"
  ```

- [ ] **JavaScript Bindings**
  ```rust
  use wasm_bindgen::prelude::*;

  #[wasm_bindgen]
  pub struct WasmSolver {
      inner: SublinearSolver,
  }

  #[wasm_bindgen]
  impl WasmSolver {
      #[wasm_bindgen(constructor)]
      pub fn new() -> WasmSolver { /* ... */ }

      #[wasm_bindgen]
      pub fn solve_pagerank(&mut self, graph_data: &JsValue) -> Result<JsValue, JsValue> {
          // WASM-compatible PageRank interface
      }
  }
  ```

#### TypeScript Definitions
- [ ] **Type Generation**
  - [ ] Automatic TypeScript definition generation
  - [ ] JSDoc documentation integration
  - [ ] Type-safe graph input formats
  - [ ] Result type definitions
  - [ ] Error handling types

- [ ] **API Wrapper Development**
  ```typescript
  export class SublinearSolver {
    constructor(config?: SolverConfig);

    async solvePageRank(
      graph: GraphInput,
      options?: PageRankOptions
    ): Promise<PageRankResult>;

    async solveLinearSystem(
      matrix: SparseMatrix,
      vector: number[]
    ): Promise<number[]>;
  }
  ```

#### Week 7 Deliverables
- [ ] Complete WASM compilation pipeline
- [ ] JavaScript/TypeScript bindings with full API coverage
- [ ] Type definitions and documentation
- [ ] Browser compatibility testing
- [ ] Node.js compatibility validation

### **Week 8: Optimization & Packaging**

#### Size & Performance Optimization
- [ ] **WASM Bundle Optimization**
  - [ ] Dead code elimination with `wee_alloc`
  - [ ] LTO (Link Time Optimization) configuration
  - [ ] Size profiling and reduction
  - [ ] Compression analysis (gzip, brotli)
  - [ ] Loading time optimization

- [ ] **Performance Profiling**
  ```bash
  # Performance measurement setup
  wasm-pack build --target web --out-dir pkg
  # Size analysis
  twiggy top pkg/sublinear_solver_bg.wasm
  # Performance benchmarking
  node benchmark.js
  ```

#### Streaming Implementation
- [ ] **Async/Streaming Support**
  ```rust
  #[wasm_bindgen]
  pub struct StreamingSolver {
      // Support for large graph processing
      // Chunked computation with progress callbacks
      // Memory-bounded streaming operations
  }
  ```

- [ ] **Progress Reporting**
  - [ ] JavaScript callback integration
  - [ ] Progress percentage calculation
  - [ ] Cancellation support
  - [ ] Memory usage monitoring

#### npm Package Preparation
- [ ] **Package Configuration**
  ```json
  {
    "name": "@sublinear/solver",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "main": "index.js",
    "types": "index.d.ts",
    "files": ["pkg/", "README.md"],
    "scripts": {
      "build": "wasm-pack build --target bundler",
      "test": "jest",
      "benchmark": "node benchmark.js"
    }
  }
  ```

- [ ] **Distribution Preparation**
  - [ ] README with usage examples
  - [ ] CHANGELOG generation
  - [ ] License file preparation
  - [ ] npm registry preparation
  - [ ] CDN distribution setup

#### Week 8 Deliverables
- [ ] Optimized WASM package under 500KB
- [ ] npm package ready for publication
- [ ] Streaming support for large graphs
- [ ] Performance benchmarks vs pure JS implementations
- [ ] Browser and Node.js compatibility confirmed

### **Quality Gates - Phase R**
- ✅ **Size**: WASM bundle optimized to <500KB
- ✅ **Performance**: Maintains sublinear performance in WASM
- ✅ **Compatibility**: Works in all major browsers and Node.js
- ✅ **API**: Complete TypeScript definitions with documentation
- ✅ **Distribution**: Ready for npm publication

---

## 🌐 Phase C: CLI & Cloud Integration (Weeks 9-10)

### **Week 9: CLI Development & HTTP Server**

#### Command-Line Interface
- [ ] **CLI Tool Development**
  ```rust
  // src/bin/sublinear-cli.rs
  use clap::{App, Arg, SubCommand};
  use sublinear_solver::*;

  fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
      let matches = App::new("sublinear-solver")
          .version("1.0")
          .about("High-performance sublinear-time solver")
          .subcommand(SubCommand::with_name("pagerank")
              .about("Compute PageRank")
              .arg(Arg::with_name("input")
                  .help("Input graph file")
                  .required(true))
              .arg(Arg::with_name("output")
                  .help("Output file")
                  .short("o")
                  .takes_value(true)))
          .get_matches();

      // CLI implementation
  }
  ```

- [ ] **CLI Features**
  - [ ] Graph format auto-detection (CSV, MTX, EdgeList)
  - [ ] Multiple output formats (JSON, CSV, Binary)
  - [ ] Progress bars for long computations
  - [ ] Configurable algorithm parameters
  - [ ] Performance timing and memory reporting
  - [ ] Batch processing support

#### HTTP Server Implementation
- [ ] **REST API Server**
  ```rust
  use warp::Filter;
  use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};

  #[derive(Deserialize)]
  struct PageRankRequest {
      graph: GraphData,
      damping: Option<f64>,
      tolerance: Option<f64>,
  }

  #[derive(Serialize)]
  struct PageRankResponse {
      scores: Vec<f64>,
      iterations: usize,
      convergence_time: f64,
  }

  async fn solve_pagerank(req: PageRankRequest) -> Result<PageRankResponse, Rejection> {
      // HTTP endpoint implementation
  }
  ```

- [ ] **API Endpoints**
  - [ ] `POST /api/v1/pagerank` - PageRank computation
  - [ ] `POST /api/v1/linear-system` - Linear system solving
  - [ ] `GET /api/v1/health` - Health check
  - [ ] `GET /api/v1/metrics` - Performance metrics
  - [ ] `POST /api/v1/graph/validate` - Graph validation

#### Week 9 Deliverables
- [ ] Complete CLI tool with comprehensive features
- [ ] HTTP server with REST API
- [ ] Docker container for easy deployment
- [ ] API documentation with OpenAPI/Swagger
- [ ] Integration tests for CLI and API

### **Week 10: Flow-Nexus Integration & Documentation**

#### Flow-Nexus Cloud Integration
- [ ] **Cloud Platform Integration**
  ```rust
  // Flow-Nexus deployment configuration
  use flow_nexus_sdk::*;

  #[derive(FlowNexusHandler)]
  pub struct SublinearSolverHandler {
      solver: SublinearSolver,
  }

  impl CloudFunction for SublinearSolverHandler {
      async fn handle(&self, request: CloudRequest) -> CloudResponse {
          // Cloud function implementation
      }
  }
  ```

- [ ] **Cloud Features**
  - [ ] Serverless function deployment
  - [ ] Auto-scaling configuration
  - [ ] Distributed graph processing
  - [ ] Result caching and persistence
  - [ ] Monitoring and alerting integration

#### Documentation Completion
- [ ] **Comprehensive Documentation**
  ```
  docs/
  ├── README.md                 # Project overview
  ├── getting-started.md        # Quick start guide
  ├── api-reference/            # Complete API docs
  │   ├── rust-api.md
  │   ├── wasm-api.md
  │   ├── cli-reference.md
  │   └── http-api.md
  ├── algorithms/               # Algorithm documentation
  │   ├── push-methods.md
  │   ├── random-walk.md
  │   ├── neumann-series.md
  │   └── hybrid-solver.md
  ├── performance/              # Performance guides
  │   ├── benchmarks.md
  │   ├── optimization.md
  │   └── scaling.md
  └── examples/                 # Usage examples
      ├── rust-examples/
      ├── javascript-examples/
      ├── cli-examples/
      └── cloud-examples/
  ```

#### Example Projects & Benchmarks
- [ ] **Example Applications**
  - [ ] Web-based PageRank visualization
  - [ ] Social network analysis CLI
  - [ ] Recommendation system integration
  - [ ] Large-scale graph processing pipeline
  - [ ] Real-time streaming graph analysis

- [ ] **Performance Benchmarks**
  - [ ] Comparison with NetworkX (Python)
  - [ ] Comparison with igraph (R)
  - [ ] Comparison with SNAP (C++)
  - [ ] Memory usage analysis
  - [ ] Scaling behavior validation

#### Week 10 Deliverables
- [ ] Flow-Nexus cloud integration complete
- [ ] Comprehensive documentation published
- [ ] Example projects and tutorials
- [ ] Performance benchmark suite
- [ ] Security audit and vulnerability assessment

### **Quality Gates - Phase C**
- ✅ **Usability**: CLI and API are intuitive and well-documented
- ✅ **Cloud Ready**: Successfully deployed to Flow-Nexus platform
- ✅ **Documentation**: Complete user and developer documentation
- ✅ **Examples**: Working examples for all use cases
- ✅ **Security**: Security audit passed with no critical issues

---

## ⚠️ Risk Mitigation & Contingency Planning

### **Technical Risks**

#### High Priority Risks
1. **WASM Performance Degradation** (Probability: Medium, Impact: High)
   - **Mitigation**: Early performance benchmarking in Week 7
   - **Contingency**: Optimize critical paths in native Rust, expose minimal WASM interface
   - **Buffer**: 3 additional days for WASM optimization

2. **Memory Constraints in Large Graphs** (Probability: High, Impact: Medium)
   - **Mitigation**: Streaming algorithms and memory pooling from Phase P
   - **Contingency**: Implement disk-based temporary storage for intermediate results
   - **Buffer**: 2 additional days per phase for memory optimization

3. **Algorithm Convergence Issues** (Probability: Low, Impact: High)
   - **Mitigation**: Extensive testing with analytical solutions in Phase P
   - **Contingency**: Fallback to well-established iterative methods
   - **Buffer**: 1 week for algorithm debugging

#### Medium Priority Risks
4. **Integration Complexity** (Probability: Medium, Impact: Medium)
   - **Mitigation**: Continuous integration testing from Phase S
   - **Contingency**: Simplified API with reduced feature set
   - **Buffer**: 3 days per integration point

5. **Documentation Lag** (Probability: High, Impact: Low)
   - **Mitigation**: Concurrent documentation during development
   - **Contingency**: Automated documentation generation tools
   - **Buffer**: 1 week dedicated documentation sprint

### **Schedule Buffers**

#### Built-in Buffers
- **Phase Overlap**: 2 days overlap between phases for handoff
- **Testing Buffer**: 20% additional time for comprehensive testing
- **Integration Buffer**: 3 days per major integration point
- **Documentation Buffer**: 1 week at project end

#### Fallback Strategies
1. **Minimum Viable Product (MVP)**
   - Rust library with basic push methods
   - Simple CLI interface
   - Basic WASM bindings
   - Essential documentation

2. **Reduced Scope Options**
   - Skip advanced hybrid algorithms → Focus on core push methods
   - Simplified WASM interface → Core functionality only
   - CLI-only deployment → Skip HTTP server initially

### **Dependencies Management**

#### External Dependencies
- **Rust Ecosystem**: `cargo`, `wasm-pack`, `wasm-bindgen`
- **JavaScript Ecosystem**: `npm`, `webpack`, `typescript`
- **Cloud Platform**: Flow-Nexus SDK and deployment tools
- **Testing Infrastructure**: GitHub Actions, Docker

#### Critical Path Dependencies
1. **Phase S → Phase P**: Data structures must be complete
2. **Phase P → Phase A**: Push algorithms must be validated
3. **Phase A → Phase R**: Unified API must be stable
4. **Phase R → Phase C**: WASM bindings must be functional

---

## 📊 Success Metrics & Quality Gates

### **Performance Targets**

#### Runtime Performance
- **Sublinear Scaling**: O(m + n log n) for graphs with m edges, n nodes
- **Memory Efficiency**: <100MB for graphs with 1M nodes
- **Convergence Speed**: <10 iterations for typical PageRank problems
- **WASM Overhead**: <50% performance penalty vs native Rust

#### Quality Metrics
- **Code Coverage**: >90% for all critical paths
- **Documentation Coverage**: 100% public API coverage
- **Test Reliability**: <1% flaky test rate
- **Security Score**: No critical vulnerabilities

### **User Acceptance Criteria**

#### Ease of Use
- **Installation Time**: <5 minutes from download to first use
- **Learning Curve**: <30 minutes to complete basic tutorial
- **API Intuitiveness**: >90% user success rate in usability testing
- **Error Messages**: Clear, actionable error messages for all failure modes

#### Production Readiness
- **Stability**: >99.9% uptime in cloud deployment
- **Scalability**: Handles 10M+ node graphs efficiently
- **Compatibility**: Works on Windows, macOS, Linux, and major browsers
- **Support**: Complete documentation with runnable examples

### **Release Criteria Checklist**

#### Phase S Completion
- [ ] All data structures implemented and tested
- [ ] Module architecture approved by technical review
- [ ] Performance baselines established
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline operational

#### Phase P Completion
- [ ] Push algorithms produce mathematically correct results
- [ ] Performance meets sublinear scaling requirements
- [ ] Test coverage >90% for algorithm code
- [ ] Benchmark results documented

#### Phase A Completion
- [ ] Hybrid solver intelligently selects algorithms
- [ ] Medium-scale testing (10K+ nodes) passes
- [ ] API design approved by usability review
- [ ] Integration testing complete

#### Phase R Completion
- [ ] WASM package <500KB and functionally complete
- [ ] TypeScript definitions accurate and complete
- [ ] Browser compatibility confirmed
- [ ] npm package ready for publication

#### Phase C Completion
- [ ] CLI tool feature-complete and user-tested
- [ ] Cloud deployment successful and stable
- [ ] Documentation complete and reviewed
- [ ] Security audit passed

---

## 🎯 Sprint Planning & Execution

### **Sprint Structure** (2-week sprints aligned with phases)

#### Sprint Planning Template
```
Sprint Goals:
- Primary Objective: [Phase milestone]
- Secondary Objectives: [2-3 supporting goals]
- Risk Items: [Identified technical risks]
- Success Criteria: [Measurable outcomes]

Daily Standups:
- What was completed yesterday?
- What will be worked on today?
- Any blockers or dependencies?
- Risk status update

Sprint Review:
- Demo all completed features
- Review metrics against targets
- Identify lessons learned
- Plan next sprint priorities
```

### **Quality Assurance Schedule**

#### Continuous Testing
- **Unit Tests**: Run on every commit
- **Integration Tests**: Run on every PR
- **Performance Tests**: Run daily on development branch
- **End-to-End Tests**: Run before phase completion

#### Review Schedule
- **Code Reviews**: Required for all changes
- **Architecture Reviews**: At phase boundaries
- **Security Reviews**: Week 6 and Week 10
- **Performance Reviews**: Week 4, 6, 8, 10

### **Communication & Reporting**

#### Weekly Status Reports
```
Week [N] Status Report
📊 Phase: [Current Phase] - [Percentage Complete]
✅ Completed This Week:
- [Major accomplishments]
- [Metrics achieved]

🏗️ In Progress:
- [Current work items]
- [Blockers being addressed]

📅 Next Week Plan:
- [Priority items]
- [Risk mitigation activities]

🚨 Risks & Issues:
- [Current risks]
- [Mitigation status]

📈 Metrics:
- Code coverage: [X]%
- Performance: [benchmarks]
- Documentation: [coverage]%
```

---

## 🏁 Final Deliverables & Launch

### **Production-Ready Packages**

#### Rust Crate
- **crates.io Publication**: `sublinear-solver v1.0.0`
- **Documentation**: Complete rustdoc with examples
- **License**: MIT or Apache 2.0
- **CI/CD**: Automated testing and publication

#### WASM/npm Package
- **npm Publication**: `@sublinear/solver v1.0.0`
- **Bundle Size**: <500KB optimized
- **TypeScript Support**: Complete type definitions
- **CDN Distribution**: Available on unpkg/jsdelivr

#### CLI Tool
- **Binary Distribution**: GitHub Releases for all platforms
- **Package Managers**: Homebrew, Chocolatey, APT
- **Docker Image**: Official Docker Hub image
- **Documentation**: Man pages and help system

#### Cloud Platform
- **Flow-Nexus Integration**: Deployed and operational
- **API Documentation**: Complete OpenAPI specification
- **Monitoring**: Health checks and performance metrics
- **Scaling**: Auto-scaling configuration

### **Launch Readiness Checklist**

#### Technical Readiness
- [ ] All automated tests passing
- [ ] Performance benchmarks meet targets
- [ ] Security audit completed
- [ ] Documentation review completed
- [ ] Example projects validated
- [ ] Deployment pipelines tested

#### Marketing & Community
- [ ] README and documentation published
- [ ] Blog post announcing release
- [ ] Community forum/Discord setup
- [ ] GitHub repository polished
- [ ] Social media announcement prepared
- [ ] Technical talks/demos scheduled

#### Support Infrastructure
- [ ] Issue tracking system configured
- [ ] FAQ and troubleshooting guides
- [ ] Support email/forum established
- [ ] Contribution guidelines published
- [ ] Roadmap for future versions
- [ ] Community governance model

---

**Next Steps**: Begin Phase S implementation with concurrent agent spawning using Claude Code's Task tool for maximum parallel execution efficiency.