# Specification Quality Checklist: Harness-Tenant Router & Multi-Project Index Context

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-06-19
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — kept behavioral; engine/file:line grounding lives in the review docs and will move to plan/research
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain — the three core forks (index model, persistence, scope split) were resolved with the user before authoring
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded (companion specs 013/014 carved out; DEF-001 deferred)
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows (multi-project working set, isolation, no-lockout, switch, single-server, errors/glossary)
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- The chosen per-harness index isolation model carries a known file-watch/lock contention risk (captured in spec Risks). Planning MUST resolve how duplicate per-harness contexts coordinate physical file watching so FR-007/FR-008 hold. This is the primary plan-phase investigation, alongside confirming the single-server transport can hold an independent tenant context per concurrent connection.
- Companion specs to author next: 013 (multi-tenant admin dashboard), 014 (durable tenancy/telemetry persistence).
