# Specification Quality Checklist: v8 Trust Remediation

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-06-17
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Spec is value-level (honest surfaces, true status, safe apply, recoverable
  start, grounded/labeled economics, published capability record + enforced
  honesty). The HOW (code anchors, fix shapes, the TR-01..TR-20 crosswalk) lives
  in `docs/reviews/v8-trust-remediation-ledger.md` and is deliberately kept out of
  the spec.
- Zero `[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]` markers: discovery is complete + verified, so
  informed defaults (phasing, relabel-first, premise-stays-OPEN, fixture-based
  verification) are documented in Assumptions rather than left open. `/speckit-clarify`
  may still refine the economics relabel-vs-ground sequencing and the if_match
  enforcement shape — those are plan-level, not spec blockers.
- All checklist items PASS on first iteration.
